By Clara Bicalho, Sisi Huang, and Markus Konrad
DeclareDesign is a set of software tools for describing, assessing, and conducting empirical research.
GET STARTEDResearch designs have four components. Learn more about the MIDA framework.
LEARN MOREYou can use our software to:
To make getting started easy, we provide a library of common research designs. These design are observational and experimental, causal and descriptive, quantitative and qualitative.
VIEW LIBRARY
By Clara Bicalho, Sisi Huang, and Markus Konrad
We often think of an instrumental variable (\(Z\)) as a random shock that generates exogenous variation in a treatment of interest \(X\). The randomness of \(Z\) lets us identify the effect of \(X\) on \(Y\), at least for units for which \(Z\) perturbs \(X\) in a way that’s not possible by just looking at the relationship between \(X\) and \(Y\). But surprisingly, we think, if effects are constant the instrumental variables estimator can be consistent for the effect of \(X\) on \(Y\) even when the relationship between the instrument (\(Z\)) and the endogenous variable (\(X\)) is confounded (for example, Hernán and Robins (2006)). That’s the good news. Less good news is that when there is effect heterogeneity you can get good estimates for some units but it can be hard to know which units those are (Swanson and Hernán 2017). We use a declaration and diagnosis to illustrate these insights.
An obvious requirement of a good research design is that the question it seeks to answer does in fact have an answer, at least under plausible models of the world. But we can sometimes get quite far along a research path without being conscious that the questions we ask do not have answers and the answers we get are answering different questions.